|
| |
Cement
Kilns: The Dirty Little Secret
More than 142 million
Americans live in areas where lung-scorching air pollution puts their
lives at risk everyday.
This is especially a concern for children. Since kids breathe more of
these powerful respiratory irritants than adults, they are more
susceptible to the side effects: asthma, chronic lung-disease, and even
cancer.
The culprit is fine soot particles. And an often-overlooked villain is the
cement industry.
While there's been a national push to reign in pollution sources from
cars, diesel engines, power plants, and refineries, there's been very
little effort to address pollution coming from cement kilns.
In one sleepy little town just south of Dallas, and just east of Fort
Worth, there's a debate taking place over three huge cement kilns: Texas
Industries (TXI), Holcim Cement, and North Texas Cement.
The largest of these sources burns both hazardous waste and tire; the
other two burn "only" tires. These three sources pump out close to
one-third of all the industrial smog in North Texas. The remaining
two-thirds come from 400 facilities. The amount of pollution from these
three cement plants is staggering.
Texas isn't the only state facing these problems. In New York, a
controversy is raging over whether a Holcim subsidiary, St. Lawrence
Cement, should be allowed to build a massive new coal-fired plant in the
Hudson Valley. The EPA, like the plant's opponents, has concluded that
this proposal fails to consider truly state-of-the-art technology.
But the cement industry isn't really committed to better technology. It's
only committed to bigger profits. In New York and Texas alike, "air
huggers" are attacked for demanding technologies which the industry claims
are "unfeasible" and "untested." But companies like Holcim conveniently
ignore practices in use by their overseas partners, and in some cases at
their own plants.
The Midlothian experience is a perfect case in point. In the late 90s,
Holcim asked Texas regulators for a major change their permit--the
document which outlines allowable pollution levels. Holcim promised North
Texans that if it was allowed to change its permit to double cement
production, that it would actually decrease emissions.
That was a promise made, and a promise broken.
After three years of trying to reach the goals of its agreement, Holcim
finally had to admit defeat. The facility was not only unable to reach the
reductions it promised--in fact, it was pumping out three times more tha
they had promised.
In response, Texas' environmental agency fined Holcim $223,125. That's a
big fine by Texas standards, but it's the equivalent of you or me getting
a parking ticket.
And then, the State gave Holcim another year-and-a-half to figure it all
out.
Simply put: Holcim broke their agreement and the law. They reneged on a
formal review process. They belched more smog forming pollution into North
Texas. And what did they get? A slap-on-the-wrist fine, and an 18-month
grace period. Meanwhile, everyone still breathing in North Texas continues
to suffer.
By the way, this wasn't the first time that Holcim's Midlothian plant had
been fined. In 1993, the plant paid $135,000 for emiting . What's a few
hundred thousand dollars every 10 years to Holcim? Nothing. They're
laughing all the way to the bank.
In sum, both Holcim and the State of Texas are guilty of allowing an
inferior cement plant to be built by a major industrial polluter with an
awful track record.
While all this was going on, a subsidiary of Holcim made its way to
another little sleepy town, with a similar scheme in mind. Near the Hudson
Rive in New York State, St. Lawrence Cement is seeking to build a
coal-fired plant permitted to emit up to 20 million pounds of regulated
pollutants every year.
In an attempt to sway public officials, St. Lawrence brought the good
folks from Hudson to Midlothian to see how they do things in the South.
Like their Texas counterparts, St. Lawrence Cement is promising jobs,
economic development, and cleaner air. But when the news came out about
the Midlothian fine, suddenly SLC is pretending they had nothing to do
with Holcim.
Today, the debate continues. Should St. Lawrence Cement and Holcim be
forced to comply with truly modern pollution control standards? Should
they be required to build modestly-scaled, tightly-regulated facilities in
sensible locations--away from where people live and breathe? We think
those are reasonable demands. It's just too bad the cement industry won't
listen to reason.
Katy Hubener
Director, Blue Skies Alliance
Sam Pratt
Executive Director, Friends of Hudson
-30- |
|